What is the difference between a Bush rant in 2003 and another one, but today?

Case in point, the Dixie Chicks. Now and then. Why are they still disliked, when more people disapprove of Bush and the Iraq War? Not a fan but curious.What is the difference between a Bush rant in 2003 and another one, but today?
The music isn't great- what i've heard of it anyway. Even politics can't change that.





If they never said anything about the war they probably would have faded into obscurity long ago.What is the difference between a Bush rant in 2003 and another one, but today?
The Dixie Chicks will always have the scarlet letter on their backs. 'W' saw to that. I don't quite get your question. Bush ';rants'; as you call them, came about because of all the manure that the idiot who called himself ';President'; got this country into. They are legitimate beefs.
the main difference is more years and factual examples of his incompetence...





in 2003 there was a nice pile of facts pointing to his incompetence...





by 2005 you could build a huge pyramid...
I don't think they are disliked They are very popular.
for one their music sucks and always has. they were over rated to begin with.